Dalibor Svrcina vs Daniil Medvedev Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Second Serve Performance: Svrcina has secured 39.58% of points on his second serve over the last six months. In comparison, Medvedev holds a slight edge, winning 43.62% of such points.
• Return Game Efficiency: Svrcina outshines with 49.29% success on opponents' second serves, while Medvedev fetches 45.63%. For first serve returns, Svrcina again leads with 33.05% versus Medvedev's 25.03%.
• Resilience Under Pressure: Could Medvedev's breakpoint-saving rate of 58.86% offer him a crucial advantage, considering Svrcina’s 47.01%?
• Performance Overview: Svrcina has won 66.29% of his matches over the past year, surpassing Medvedev’s 58.73% win rate.
• Surface Preference: Will Medvedev leverage his dominance on hard surfaces with a 75% career win rate, compared to Svrcina's 62% on indoor hard courts?
• Event Level Experience: Medvedev has faced higher-ranked opponents on the Main tour, averaging against players ranked 55.68, while Svrcina competes more frequently at Challenger/ITF level.
• Deciding Set Performance: When matches go the distance, Svrcina triumphs 65% of the time, compared to Medvedev's 53% success rate.
• Breaking Down Breakpoints: Can Svrcina's ability to convert 39.49% of breakpoints put him at an advantage over Medvedev's 30.91% conversion rate?

Editorial Prediction (July 30, 2025, UTC):

In evaluating the head-to-head statistics, several factors stand out. Medvedev holds a slight advantage in second serve performance, which is closely tied to match success rates.

Svrcina, on the other hand, shows significant strengths in return game statistics, particularly on first and second serves, which could tilt the scales in his favor under certain conditions.

The player’s capacity to handle pressure indicates Medvedev might have an edge with his superior breakpoint-saving abilities. His rich experience on the Main tour and against formidable opponents further bolsters his position.

However, Medvedev's lesser performance in deciding sets and breakpoint conversion could present opportunities for Svrcina, especially given his tenacity and higher win percentage over the past year.

Taking all factors into account, including surface preferences and competition levels, Daniil Medvedev is likely to emerge victorious in this match due to his consistency in playing at higher levels and stronger serve under pressure.